By: sharp as a marble
i do not know why they would do this. if they are infact erin’s clients she will file motion’s to dismiss, and these horribly vague claims will be tossed and create a federal precedent. seriously talk...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
There is a recent filing where a Doe’s lawyer stated that the Doe had consulted Adam, and without the Doe’s permission Adam contacted Plaintiff’s counsel and attempted to negotiate a settlement on the...
View ArticleBy: Raul
Prenda’s narcissistic anger blinded them to the realities at play here. Prenda files these crap cases in state courts for several reasons, one of these reasons is that federal courts operate on strict...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
That sounds like a good reason for any Doe involved in the state case to retain Erin and guarantee a fast-track to federal court and an easier dismissal, plus possible award of fees and sanctions. If...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
Is the staying of subpoenas retroactive or just for those whose deadline hasn’t passed?
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
I can’t help but be positive these cases are for all intents and purposes, nothing more than LightSpeed media. They saw the LSM case going to hell thanks to the ISPs, so they took the information...
View ArticleBy: sharp as a marble
it is possible that urbanski had a flat rate agreement with the “plaintiff” so that all of his negotiations would be for 2k. so he just “claimed” he negotiated it when it was a group rate style...
View ArticleBy: sharp as a marble
so you know how they are saying that this is not copyright infringement related and so there is no preemption by the copyright act(at least that’s what they are saying in the LSM cases)? yea if you...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
This does not appear to be retroactive. I have to agree, to a point, with the troll. This really is too little too late. It is a step in the right direction, but it is a small step. Hopefully this...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
sorry if im slow but im new to reading up on this. i just assumed somehow this related to using torrents or something. so this is all just like about “hacking” some website by using a illegal key or...
View ArticleBy: That Anonymous Dude
Oh have you seen the IP exhibits for these individual Guava cases? Minus the one filed by Duffy in ILND, they have no timestamps (Duffy didn’t even file an exhibit with his complaint in DCD). Oh and I...
View ArticleBy: That Anonymous Dude
Yeah well, tack on the exhibits with no timestamps, that contain multiple IPs but for a suit against one person. Multiple IPs that are located in three different cities and assigned by two different...
View ArticleBy: That Anonymous Dude
Definitely. Obviously not a very well thought out motion. Someone’s letting their anger seep into their legal filings…bad bad bad thing. I’ve never seen any Prenda attorney attack opposing counsel by...
View ArticleBy: sharp as a marble
correct, these claims (guava, arte de xoaca, and lightspeed media) are NOT about bittorrent. they are a claim that someone used a password to the site(s) that they did not own. ie they googled...
View ArticleBy: SJD
Steele believes that Erin botched his con. All his attempts to brag that he already has info are bogus. In that case he would laugh, not spill saliva. I’m not even sure it was Erin who thwarted the...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
@SJD I thought I read at some point either on this thread or the actual guava thread that people have already gotten letters and that he had their info
View ArticleBy: sharp as a marble
they have gotten alot of doe info returned b4 the subpoena’s were stayed. this does not mean they have the gaul or resources to sue every person, and the judge can still order all of the info they did...
View ArticleBy: Anonymous
Agreed SJD, the unprofessionalism in these filings is fantastic. Prenda’s clowns are incompetent enough when calm and sober; getting Steele worked up just means more and stupider mistakes, which could...
View Article
